Why are Man Utd better without the ball?

Under Michael Carrick, Manchester United average only 1.5 points per game when they have more than 50% of the ball. When they have less than 50%, this number shoots up to 2.6.

And if you drop possession further, to 45% or below, United have won 10 games out of the past 10 since Carrick took the job.

It is a staggering correlation but it brings the Englishman to the same crossroads that former United manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer found himself at.

How do you bridge the game from a seemingly elite counter-attacking side to one capable of beating teams that give you the ball?

The answer has long eluded United.

Going down to 10 men on the way to a 1-0 derby defeat is far from ideal, but at full-time Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca offered a different perspective.

"We had a plan for 11 versus 11, but after the red card the game completely changed, but also for them.

"They love transitions and space in behind, but the game became more difficult.

"We just dropped, [offering] no space in behind and no more transitions, which is why the game was also more difficult for them."

This was an astute analysis of United's most recent game as well as their team this year.

As divisive as the phrase "United DNA" is, it undoubtedly remains a key part of the conversation about United both externally and internally.

This is because certain coaches have leaned into the club's roots, while others have tried but failed to move away from those ideas.

"We want to win; we want to be excited - that's why we love this club. I'm fully aware that we need to do it in a certain way," said Carrick when asked what style of football he wanted his United side to play.

Here he echoed the sentiment of United's most successful manager, Sir Alex Ferguson, who in 2017 said: "You have a duty to entertain. We have to always remember there's a public to be entertained."

With excitement seemingly non-negotiable for Ferguson, it is obvious why fans and players of that era resonate with a United that create spectacles.

With the messaging around Carrick's style of play being one of proactivity, excitement and directness, it is no surprise that United look better with space to attack – something that happens more often for a team with less of the ball.

The strengths of the squad are suited to this approach, with goalkeeper Senne Lammens a good long kicker of the ball. In defenders Harry Maguire and Lisandro Martinez, United have punchy progressive passers from deep too.

In attack, Marcus Rashford is a willing runner in behind, often moving into a striker position despite starting on the wing. The same can be said for Bryan Mbeumo.

Bruno Fernandes, central to all of this, is a strong passer when attacking in transition, finding runners ahead of him – a role in which he broke the Premier League assist record last term.

Carrick has also provided certain players a level of freedom to make their own decisions on the pitch.

"Giving Bruno the platform to go and perform [has helped him]," Carrick said in April.

"We're trying to create a structure to try to bring out the best of everyone, but I like seeing Bruno in attacking positions with a bit of freedom."

Although players may enjoy this responsibility, how the team play can be swayed by individual players' natural tendencies.

With more risk-taking, direct passers in the side, when United are asked to disorganise stubborn defences their long-standing habits can mean losing the ball more often.

Click here to read article